X Factor sleaze storm grows: TV watchdog to act after thousands protest over 'disgusting' prime-time scenes
By Paul Revoir
Last updated at 1:17 AM on 14th December 2010
ITV faces a huge backlash after thousands of viewers protested about lewd performances on the X Factor final.
Critics called on media regulator Ofcom to launch an inquiry into why ‘disgusting’ routines were shown before the watershed.
The performances by U.S. pop stars Christina Aguilera and Rihanna could have broken Ofcom’s broadcasting code which seeks to protect children from sexualised content.
Shown before 9pm: Christina Aguilera and her dancers perform an explicit routine. Ofcom demanded an inquiry
'Christina's blonde dancer with the suspenders and bum hanging out is soft porn,' said one disgusted viewer
Horrified parents – who watched the show with their sons and daughters – also accused ITV of breaking the bond of trust with viewers by failing to tone down the performances for younger fans.
By last night ITV had received about 1,000 complaints about the routines with Ofcom understood to have received a further 1,000-plus.
The media regulator is assessing the points made before deciding whether to launch a full-scale investigation into whether the raunchy material was ‘editorially justified’.
Ofcom’s Broadcasting Code states that ‘children must be protected by appropriate scheduling from material that is unsuitable for them’. It adds: ‘Material that is unsuitable for children should not, in general, be shown before 9pm or after 5.30am.’ The ITV show aired between 7pm and 9pm on Saturday night.
So sleazy: Simulated sex, porn imagery and provocative costumes surprised and upset many viewers, who complained in their thousands
Triple X Factor: Christina Aguilera's racy performance should never have been shown before the 9pm watershed, said pressure group Mediawatch UK
The code also states that: ‘Any discussion on, or portrayal of, sexual behaviour must be editorially justified if included before the watershed.’
Simulated sexual moves, ‘porn imagery’ and provocative costumes stunned many who had expecting a more sober final weekend on the show.
During her Saturday night performance of What’s My Name, Rihanna shed her gown and cavorted around the stage in underwear, performing a series of suggestive dance moves.
She was surrounded by an army of dancers who performed in a similar way. This was then followed by Miss Aguilera’s performance which saw her in an extremely low-cut black dress writhing around the stage with her troupe of scantily-clad dancers.
Raunchy: Rihanna's routine also came under fire with viewers unhappy about her suggestive dance moves and skimpy clothing
They were seen sitting in chairs striking suggestive poses in nothing more than stockings, knickers and bras.
Parents are dismayed that the UK’s biggest family TV show resorted to such lurid tactics when it was already guaranteed to get massive ratings.
They accuse it of providing a ‘sad’ and ‘terrible’ role model for children with what they called ‘soft porn’ routines.
Others claimed it would effectively encourage sexism in young boys and encourage young girls to dress inappropriately.
There were further complaints that boyband member Harry Styles was seen mouthing an obscene quip at winner Matt Cardle after Sunday night’s result was revealed.
The TV pressure group Mediawatch UK said it too had received complaints from the public about Saturday night’s final.
Director Vivienne Pattison said: ‘I don’t think it was suitable for a pre-watershed broadcast, I think that’s quite clear.
‘It was the simulated sexual stuff, that was the problem. I think Ofcom should look into this. Whether the X Factor like it or not they are commanding audiences of more than 19million. They are role models whether they like it or not.’
She added: ‘We have a broadcasting code that expects certain things to be post-watershed and I think that one crossed the line.’
Obscenity: Other viewers complained that One Direction singer Harry Styles (second left) was seen mouthing an obscenity at winner Matt Cardle after the result was revealed on Sunday
Former Conservative MP Ann Widdecombe, who appeared on this year’s Strictly Come Dancing, said: ‘It is before the watershed so parents are entitled to some consideration from the TV bosses. I think it is a pity. It isn’t necessary and it should be a family show. If you are going to that sort of thing they should put it on after the watershed and it ceases to be a family show.
‘I think Ofcom should take it seriously. What is the point of having a watershed? I think Strictly by comparison is serious family fun.’
Liberal Democrat culture spokesman Don Foster said: ‘One of the routines was particularly inappropriate and it may lead a number of parents to consider whether or not next year’s show is something that their younger children watch.
'It was unnecessary and I think they should have toned it down. I just think it went a step too far.’
An Ofcom spokesman said: ‘Ofcom has received complaints about Saturday night’s X Factor. Like all complaints we will assess them against the broadcasting code and consider whether to investigate.’
A spokesman for the programme maker Talkback Thames said: ‘We are confident that the performances given by our guest artistes on Saturday were appropriate for the show.’
An ITV insider said what was aired on the show was no worse than much of what goes out on dedicated music TV channels during the day.
It was also claimed that Miss Aguilera’s routine, based on her movie Burlesque, had been toned down from what was in the film, which has a rating of 12A. The source pointed out that there was no swearing or nudity in the routine.
At the UK premiere of the film last night Miss Aguilera was asked whether she thought her routine on The X Factor was too raunchy. She said: ‘I don’t think there is such a thing as being too raunchy when it comes to the art form of burlesque.’
Explore more:Add your comments
Here's what readers have had to say so far. Why not add your thoughts below, or debate this issue live on our message boards.
The comments below have been moderated in advance.
Time to end the TV tax. Even the BBC news 'service' has become second rate compared with the internet which is free mostly. We get very little for the 3 billion pounds which is extorted from us under threat of imprisonment. Once a national institution to be proud of, it has now become grubby and corrupt. I have paid my license fee for the last time.
- rick, france, 14/12/2010 00:19
No worse than Strictly Dancing, fgs get a life. It's showbiz, with a bit of Christmas glitz and glamour and Christmas cheer.
- Mary, London, 14/12/2010 00:19
these will be the same people who allow there kids to use console games where they are exposed to violence etc.
- gordini, sinapore/scotland, 14/12/2010 00:18
I for one thought the Rihanna number was fabulous. Her outfit was not that skimpy and the dancing was very Carribean in flavor which is where she is from. I can't see how this is any different to some of the very minimal outfits worn on SCD. Performing a Rumba is just as sexual if not more so. Christina's set was a little more sexual in tone but she herself was covered up. On the whole I don't think it was massively over the top and we never got a close up of the dancers. What's worst exposing youngsters to a little bit of sexy dancing or the fame machine known as the X-Factor with it's mentally unstable contestants and arguments. Come on people get a life.
- Lesley Nash, Colchester, Essex, 14/12/2010 00:18
I have to admit to being shocked at that performance. There was absolutely no need for it to be shoved in our faces so early in the evening.
- Zandranna, Christchurch, Dorset, 14/12/2010 00:16
This article needs more photos so I can try to understand why people complained.
- Harry Beaver, Hampshire, 14/12/2010 00:15
The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.
Add your comment
Monday, 13 December 2010
X Factor sleaze storm grows: TV watchdog to act after thousands protest over lewd prime-time scenes | Mail Online